<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Teleogistic &#187; demonstratives</title>
	<atom:link href="http://teleogistic.net/tag/demonstratives/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://teleogistic.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 16:24:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>I like ambiguous demonstratives</title>
		<link>http://teleogistic.net/2009/04/i-like-ambiguous-demonstratives/</link>
		<comments>http://teleogistic.net/2009/04/i-like-ambiguous-demonstratives/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 19:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Boone Gorges</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[etc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ambiguity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demonstratives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teleogistic.net/?p=127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the recent changes to Facebook that went undiscussed (or at least less discussed than the it-looks-like-Twitter thing) is liking. Attached to most of the pieces of content that appear in Facebook is a button that says &#8220;Like&#8221;. The intent seems to be this: liking is like commenting without content. Kinda like carving your [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the recent changes to Facebook that went undiscussed (or at least less discussed than the it-looks-like-Twitter thing) is <em>liking</em>. Attached to most of the pieces of content that appear in Facebook is a button that says &#8220;Like&#8221;. The intent seems to be this: <em>liking</em> is like commenting without content. Kinda like carving your name into a picnic table &#8211; not because you have anything to say, but just because you want to let everyone know that <em>you were there</em>. Neato.</p>
<p><img src="http://teleogistic.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/like.jpg" alt="I like this" title="I like this" class="alignright size-full wp-image-128" /></p>
<p>There&#8217;s something ambiguous about <em>liking</em>, though. Imagine the following situations:</p>
<ol>
<li>Friend 1 posts an abstract drawing that she made in MS Paint. </li>
<li>Friend 2 posts a status update that says &#8220;I got a new job and I am very happy about it&#8221;.</li>
<li>Friend 3 posts an artsy photograph of a beer.</li>
<li>Friend 4 posts a link to her singing a song about how she is very sad.</li>
</ol>
<p>Clicking &#8220;Like&#8221; in each case means something different. In (1), the only real candidate as the object of my liking is the picture itself, especially since it&#8217;s not a picture <em>of</em> anything. In (2), the most likely liked entity is not the status update itself (which is not particularly funny or poetic or otherwise remarkable) but the fact that my friend got a new job and is happy about it. In (3), it&#8217;s not really clear: I could be liking the picture (since it&#8217;s so artsy and thus awesome) or the beer (since it&#8217;s beer). In (4), presumably I like the song, not the link (which would just be a URL or something like that) or the propositional content of the song (that the singer is sad).</p>
<p>We might pinpoint this ambiguity in the demonstrative &#8220;this&#8221; that Facebook attaches to each act of liking. When you single out the object of your liking with &#8220;this&#8221; and without a sortal, there is room for audience interpretation as to what you really meant to like.</p>
<p>However (as I just realized &#8211; while writing the previous paragraph, I got a notification from Facebook in another window letting me know that someone likes <em>my status</em>) Facebook doesn&#8217;t always leave the sortal out. In the notifications section, you are told that someone likes your <em>status</em> or your <em>picture</em> or whatever. But clearly, as in example (2) above, this is sometimes not the intent at all. So in this case the phrase &#8220;this status&#8221; might be acting metonymically, as shorthand for &#8220;the propositional content of this status&#8221; or something like that (like when you say &#8220;I like this book&#8221;, I suppose).</p>
<p>Cases like (4) are the interesting ones, because you might end up sending the wrong message &#8211; there are legitimate candidates for thing-liked that are not very nice. I suppose that, where friends are concerned, ambiguities will be interpreted with generosity. But you might want to be careful what you like!</p>
<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://teleogistic.net/2009/04/i-like-ambiguous-demonstratives/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

